Variations on the mutual recognition and the Directive 2006/123/ CE in the framework of the provision of services.
Keywords:
European Union. Freedom to provide services. Principle of mutual recognition. Principle of country of origin and related derogations. Administrative cooperation.Abstract
The principle of mutual recognition and country of origin, as they have been build and modulated by the Court of Luxembourg, continue to be a key factor in the accomplishment of the internal market of services. The elimination of barriers to the development of service activities between Member States is essential in order to strengthen integration and promote balanced and sustainable economic and social progress. Those barriers cannot be removed solely by relying on direct application of Article 49 of the Treaty, since, on the one hand, addressing them on a case-by-case basis through infringementprocedures would, especially following enlargement, be extremely complicated for national and Community institutions, and, on the other hand, the lifting of many barriers requires prior coordination of national legal schemes, including the setting up of administrative cooperation. Nevertheless, such principles cannot be understood in absolute terms in relation to the access and the activity of the service, devoted to the global competitiveness of the providers of services who circulate freely within the European Union. The maintenance of the European social model not only legitimizes but also justifies the action of the country of destination in the control and supervision of such activities in accordance with the administrative community principles of non-discrimination, necessity, equivalence and proportionality. Directive 2006/123/EC on services replies to this challenge and has appeared before public European opinion as a transactional solution between different ideological models relative to the functioning of the market. The terms of reference of the principle of country of origin (Bolkestein’s proposal) have been sacrificed in favour of the principle of free provision of services that codifies the case-law of the Court of Justice on the matter. Nevertheless, its essence is maintained and is reinforced by means of a necessary administrative simplification and the establishment of a flexible administrative cooperation.Downloads
Published
2008-05-09
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.