Ideology
Picking up the Pieces?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.50.05Abstract
Ideology studies have undergone considerable transformation over the past thirty years. New methodologies and approaches have recast the insights and interpretations it can deliver and that have established it as a major type of political thinking. More recently, however, the production and dissemination of ideologies have adopted novel forms that present a challenge even to the latest manifestations of thinking politically among groups and societies. They demand a reassessment of effective ways of understanding ideologies, especially under conditions of broad but fragmented articulation and circulation. Ideologies are now in pieces, dismantled, fractured, sporadic, discontinuous, even scavenged. The article discusses six trends in the mutation of their contents and patterns: deintellectualization, the brevity of transmitted messages, the democracy-challenging super-atomization of voices in the public domain, the increasing speed of change, the easy transfer of ideas across conventional boundaries, and a subtle opacity, often unintentionally concealed from producers and consumers alike. Their study can benefit from combining the investigation of the durable features of conceptual morphology with a sharp eye for the fluid and shifting cultural currents within which that morphology is filtered.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Freeden
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.