Renewal in the History of Political Thought
The reception in the Spanish and Latin American world of conceptual history
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.50.02Abstract
The influence and application of some of the main postulates of what is known as the "linguistic turn" led, beginning in the 1970s, to a deep renewal in the field of intellectual history. Among the currents that broke with the traditional history of ideas are the "historical contextualism" (history of languages and political discourses) of the so-called Cambridge School and the history of political and social concepts (Begriffsgeschichte) of the German historian Reinhart Koselleck. Throughout convergences and controversies, both schools have returned ideas and texts to their historicity in the form of language. German conceptual history, with its research on political-conceptual change in modernity, its relationship with social history and its theoretical dimension in the study of historical temporalities, has had fruitful roots in Spain since the late twentieth century, up to the point of becoming, both in the field of philosophy and historiography, the main current in the history of political and social ideas. The thrust of Hispanic historiography has even reached a transnational dimension, crystallizing in various Ibero-American projects, dictionaries, and publications. After twenty-five years of results, the possibilities offered by the theory and methodology of conceptual history are far from being exhausted.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nere Basabe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.