Yeast and dough
Failed discussions on the European spirit at the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation (1933-1936)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2022.AL.03Abstract
This article examines the main discussions about the European spirit in the intellectual debates sponsored by the League of Nations. Using as a reference the congresses on intellectual cooperation held in various European capitals between 1933 and 1936, we will analyse the perspectives and limits of the reflections on the Europeanism of the intellectuals in the 1930s. Through the documentation of the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation, you can reconstruct some of the main lines of this reflection developed within the intellectual elites of the time. The study sheds light on the intellectual contradictions raised by the binomial universality and nationalism, or the paradox of a liberal internationalism which, despite the novelty of its proposals, preserved a Eurocentric notion of the world.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Navascués Santiago de
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
