Teruel, war-torn region
survival strategies, death, and community reconstruction in the post-war period, 1938-1953
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.47.04Abstract
The south-western half of Teruel province is an exceptional space for understanding the particularities of postwars in territories devastated by modern wars. The tools provided by social and cultural history of war allow us to understand how the population both in the capital and its hinterland faced a major humanitarian crisis during the decade after the Battle of Teruel. This critical situation was directly related to the effects of war itself and was exacerbated by the broader state-building process of the Francoist regime and its policies. The article analyses documentation generated by provincial courts and the correspondence between the provincial governor and various state agencies, combining it with testimonies of contemporary witnesses. This highlights how the process of community reconstruction took place and which kind of strategies were implemented by ordinary people in order to survive. All of this places us before the socioeconomic consequences of war in Teruel: soil pollution, cluster bomb accidents, child labor, extreme poverty, burglaries and thefts, lack of public safety, abuses of authority and disobedience, social exclusion, suicides, and mental illnesses.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 David Alegre
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.