Strange companions of revolutionary nationalism. The conspiracy of Catalan separatism and radical Spanish nationalists against Marshal Joffre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.49.11Abstract
This article is based on an apparently impossible assumption: the collaboration between marginal individuals of Catalan separatism and Lerrouxism to perpetrate a chimerical attack against French Marshal Joseph Joffre on his visit to Barcelona to preside the 1920 Jocs Florals event. Regarding its preparation, the authors propose how the traditional interpretation of Catalan political and social reality was not limited to the simple confrontation between right and left and among nationalisms, but that the game of alliances and friendships in their political substratum was a lot more complex than traditionally revealed by Catalan and Spanish historiography. The context in which the conspiracy takes place is marked by the crisis of the liberal state model and the emergence of different nationalist and revolutionary bets in Europe, which had in common a horizon of civil servant promotion that allowed the meeting of two political movements with seemingly disparate political motivations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Joan Esculies Serrat, David Martínez Fiol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.