The League of Nations in its centenary:
A thriving historiographical field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.45.12Abstract
This article revises the historiography on the League of Nations from a period of relative oblivion, after the end of World War II, to the expansion of interest in the organization that began in the 1990s and continues today. The essay reviews the themes and interpretations that have interested historians and the reasons that explain the lack of interest during the Cold War and the explosion of publications in recent years. The end of the bipolar conflict, the debate on the so-called «globalization» and the transformations in the historiographic field with the strong impact of global and transnational approaches and the renewal of imperial history largely explain the growing interest of historians in the League of Nations. Finally, the article briefly raises the possible continuity of the historiographical boom on the international organization.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 José Antonio Sánchez Román
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
