With vote and voice A new assessment of liberal political cultures from the electorate’s perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.46.03Abstract
During the reign of Elizabeth II, with the exception of the Progressive Biennium stage, the civic festivals disappeared. Later, the renewal of the Carnival turned the festival into a space for popular mobilization in which a group of dissidents from the Elizabethan regime restored a ritual inspired by the civic festivals of the Liberal Revolution. The popularity of the Carnival festival in the first five years of the 1860s must be interpreted in terms of the proliferation of progressive festivals dedicated to San Baldomero and the national holidays of the liberal states. Therefore, the Carnival became a popular civic festival to the extent that its renewal was promoted by a group of republican professionals dedicated to the press, leisure and culture. The success of the renewal of the festival was based on the ability to involve the leisure industry, which saw in the festival the possibility of attracting popular urban sectors to its establishments, and weaving a network of solidarity between recreational and educational societies and cultural. The philanthropic dimension of the festival, heir to the civic festivals, contributed to reinforcing the bonds of solidarity between the popular classes, the professional republican groups and the progressive elites, without awakening the fears of the conservative elites.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jordi Roca Vernet
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.