Signatures of conservatism: Petitioning, popular politics and campaigns against reform in Britain, 1780-1918
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.46.06Abstract
Accounts of mass petitioning in Britain have generally focused on the deployment of petitions within progressive, reformist or liberal campaigns. Classic examples include anti-slavery, radicalism, Chartism, free trade, and women’s suffrage. Yet the new forms of mass collective petitioning that emerged in the late eighteenth century are best regarded as neutral technologies. Many of the largest petitions of the nineteenth century came from conservative, tory, loyalist, anti-reform or reactionary campaigns. The defence of the established churches consistently mobilised tens of thousands of petitions, and millions of signatures, as did opposition to granting rights to Catholics and Dissenters. To give another example, protectionist interests resisted free trade. These campaigns reveal that conservative petitioning was generally reactive, responding to proposed changes. In addition, the practice of petitioning within such movements made greater use of established bodies, such as clergy and the church, and was rather slower to develop new forms of association and adopt the new modes of mass petitioning than their opponents. For example, conservatives continued to emphasise the respectability and quality of signatures and petitioners, even after numbers had become increasingly important in the public debates over petitions on key issues. The use of petitioning was also significant in maintaining conservative identity. Overall, the engagement of conservatives shows how they adapted, if not to democracy, then to popular politics in the nineteenth century.
Downloads
References
Agnes, B. (2013) A Chartist Singularity?: Mobilizing to Promote Democratic Petitions in Britain and France, 1838-1848. Labour History Review, 78(1), 51-66.
Barbary, V. (2008) Reinterpreting “Factory Politics” in Bury, Lancashire, 1868-1880. Historical Journal, 51(1) 115-44.
Blake, R. (1985) The Conservative Party from Peel to Thatcher. London: Fontana.
Blaxill, L. (2020) The War of Words: The Language of British Elections, 1880-1914. Woodbridge: Boydell/ Royal Historical Society.
Carpenter, D. (2016) Recruitment by Petition: American Antislavery, French Protestantism, English Suppression. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 700-23.
Carpenter, D. and D. Brossard (2019) L’éruption patriote: The Revolt against Dalhousie and the Petitioning Explosion in Nineteenth-Century French Canada. Social Science History, 43(3), 453-85.
Carpenter, D. and C.D. Moore (2014) When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Mobilization of American Women. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 479-98.
Carpenter, D. and B. Schneer (2015) Party Formation through Petitions: The Whigs and the Bank War of 1832-1834. Studies in American Political Development, 29(2), 213-34.
Carpenter, D., Z. Popp, T. Resch, B. Schneer and N. Topich (2018) Suffrage Petitioning as Formative Practice: American Women Presage and Prepare for the Vote, 1840-1940. Studies in American Political Development, 32(1), 24-48.
Chase, M. (2019) What Did Chartism Petition For?: Mass Petitions in the British Movement for Democracy. Social Science History, 43(3), 531-51.
Cragoe, M. (2008) The Great Reform Act and the Modernization of British Politics: The Impact of Conservative Associations, 1835-1841. Journal of British Studies, 47(3), 581-603.
Daunton, M. (2001) , Trusting Leviathan: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dumas, P. (2016) Proslavery Britain: Fighting for Slavery in an Era of Abolition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Ellens, J. (1994) Religious Routes to Gladstonian Liberalism: The Church Rate Conflict in England and Wales, 1852-1868. University Park, PA.: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gleadle, K. (2007) Charlotte Elizabeth Tonna and the Mobilization of Tory Women in Early Victorian England. Historical Journal, 50(1), 97-117.
Griffin, B. (2012) Politics of Gender in Victorian Britain: Masculinity, Political Culture and the Struggle for Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gurney, P. (2014) , The Democratic Idiom: Languages of Democracy in the Chartist Movement. Journal of Modern History, 86(3), 566-602.
Gutzke, D. (1989) Protecting the Pub: Brewers and Publicans against Temperance. Woodbridge: Boydell/ Royal Historical Society.
Hall, C., K. McClelland, and J. Rendall (2000) Defining the Victorian Nation: Class, Race and Gender and the British Reform Act of 1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harling, P. (1995) The Waning of ‘Old Corruption’: The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain, 1779-1846. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Harrison (1978) Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain. London: Croom Helm.
________ (1994) Drink and the Victorians: The Temperance Question in England, 1815-1872. Keele: Keele University Press.
Huzzey, R. (2019) A Microhistory of British Antislavery Petitioning. Social Science History, 43(3), 599-623.
Huzzey, R. and H. Miller (2020) Petitions, Parliament and Political Culture: Petitioning the House of Commons, 1780-1918.
___________ (forthcoming) The Politics of Petitioning: Parliament, Government and Subscriptional Cultures in Britain, 1780-1918. History.
Innes, J., M. Philp and R. Saunders (2013) The Rise of Democratic Discourse in the Reform Era: Britain in the 1830s and 1840s. J. Innes and M. Philp (eds), Re-imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland, 1750-1850 (pp. 114-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Janse, M. (2019) “What Value Should We Attach to All These Petitions?”: Petition Campaigns and the Problem of Legitimacy in the Nineteenth-Century Netherlands. Social Science History, 43(3), 509-30.
Jenkins, T. (1994) The Liberal Ascendancy, 1830-1886. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Jones, A. (1972) The Politics of Reform, 1884. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, E. (2017) Edmund Burke and the Invention of Modern Conservatism, 1830-1914: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawrence, J. (1993) Class and Gender in the Making of Urban Toryism, 1880-1914. English Historical Review, 108(428), 629-52.
Marsh, P.T. (1978) The Discipline of Popular Government: Lord Salisbury’s Domestic Statecraft, 1881-1902. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
Midgley, C. (1992) Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns, 1780-1870. London: Routledge.
Miller (2012) Popular Petitioning and the Corn Laws, 1833-1846. English Historical Review, 127(527), 882-919.
______ (2017) Petition! Petition!! Petition!!!: Petitioning and Political Organization in Britain, c. 1800-1850. H. te Velde and M. Janse (eds), Organizing Democracy: Reflections on the Rise of Political Organizations in the Nineteenth Century (pp. 43-61). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
______ (2019) Introduction: The Transformation of Petitioning in the Long Nineteenth Century (1780-1914). Social Science History, 43(3), 409-29.
_________ (forthcoming) The British Women’s Suffrage Movement and the Practice of Petitioning, 1890-1914. Historical Journal.
Neuheiser, J. (2016) Crown, Church and Constitution: Popular Conservatism in England, 1815-1867. New York: Berghahn.
Palacios Cerezales, D. (2019) Re-imagining Petitioning in Spain (1808-1823). Social Science History, 43(3), 487-508.
Parry, J. (1993) The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain, 1830-1886. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
Paz, D. (1992) Popular Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian England. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
Philp, M. (1995) Vulgar Conservatism, 1792-3. English Historical Review, 110(435), 42-69.
Pickering, P. (2001) “And Your Petitioners, &c.” Chartist Petitioning in Popular Politics, 1838-1848. English Historical Review, 116(466), 368-88.
Pinabarsi, S. (forthcoming). Manchester Antislavery, 1792-1807. Slavery & Abolition.
Prochaska, F. (2012) Eminent Victorians on American Democracy: The View from Albion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pugh, M. (2000) The March of the Women: A Revisionist Analysis of the Campaign for Women’s Suffrage, 1866-1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, M. (2006) “Villa Toryism” and Popular Conservatism in Leeds, 1885-1902. Historical Journal, 49(1), 217-46.
Salmon, P. (2002) Electoral Reform at Work: Local Politics and National Parties, 1832-1841. Woodbridge: Boydell/Royal Historical Society.
Saunders (2011) Democracy and the Vote in British Politics, 1848-1867: The Making of the Second Reform Act. Farnham: Ashgate.
______ (2013) Democracy. D. Craig and J. Thompson (eds), Languages of Politics in Nineteenth-Century Britain (pp. 142-67). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Saward, M. (2010 The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shannon, R.T. (1992) The Age of Disraeli, 1868-1881. London: Longman.
______________ (1996) The Age of Salisbury, 1881-1902. London: Longman.
Stewart, R. (1978) The Foundation of the Conservative Party, 1830-1867. London: Longman.
Thackeray, D. (2013) Conservatism for the Democratic Age: Conservative Cultures and the Challenge of Mass Politics in Early Twentieth-Century England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Tilly, C. (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Vallance, E. (2019) Loyalty, Memory and Public Opinion in England, 1658-1727. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Wilton, C. (2000) Popular Politics and Political Culture in Upper Canada, 1800-1850. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Windscheffel, A. (2007) , Popular Conservatism in Imperial London, 1868-1906. London: British Academy.
Zaeske, S. (2003) Signatures of Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery and Women’s Political Identity. Chapel Hill, NC.: University of North Carolina Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Henry Miller
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.