A civic role-model with a life of its own. The national militiaman during the first half of Spain’s 19th century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.46.05Abstract
During the nineteenth century, the national militiaman was both a figure of civic identification and political controversy. By drawing on parliamentary debates, pamphlets, newspaper articles, and archive material, this article analyses the debate about the figure of the Militiaman during the first half of Spain’s nineteenth century. Its first part focuses on Spain’s early constitutional phase (1812-1814 and 1820-23). The National Militia, which was initially imagined as an abstract player in a system of checks-and balances, became alive through civic initiative. The Militiaman thus became a civic ideal of radical liberalism. The second part of this article centres on the early reign of Isabel II (1833-1844). It underlines how progresista politicians emotionalized and radicalized the images associated with the National Militiaman to conquer a dominant position in the political conflicts of the time. However, this radicalization could not be controlled. These results show, first, that high political discourse and its popular appropriations were mutually reinforcing factors and demonstrate, secondly, how civic imaginaries broadened the scope of justifiable actions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Louise Zbiranski

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



