Weapons forged by our rivals. Catholic mobilisation in the Liberal Age (1812-1874)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.46.07Abstract
This article outlines the history of the Spanish Catholic petition drives from 1812, when Catholic activist collected twenty thousand signatures against the abolition of the Inquisition, to 1869, when they gathered three million signatures opposing freedom of religion. This last campaign, albeit with some irregularities in the procuring of names, produced the most considerable amount of signatures to a petition of nineteenth-century Spain. The research is built upon newspapers, printed leaflets, records of parliamentary debates and parliamentary and Vatican archival collections. Contrary to other nineteenth-century drives, Spanish Catholic petitions usually accepted signatures of women and children, thus clashing with the virile understanding of citizenship embraced by the dominant liberal culture. By paying attention to this and other peculiarities, this article aims to reconstruct the cultural understandings that, in dialogue with the experiences of Catholics of other countries, the Spanish activists developed in order to make use of mass-signed petitions and addresses, a form of doing politics that many understood as belonging to the world of Jacobinism and liberalism. The main conclusion is that Catholic activism played a crucial role in the inscription of the social movement, here understood as a peculiar form of doing politics, into the political culture of nineteenth-century Spaniards.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Diego Palacios Cerezales

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



