Not only 23F. PSOE and the autonomic rationalization (1978-1982)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.45.10Abstract
The signing of the Autonomous Agreements by the PSOE and UCD in July 1981 has been traditionally interpreted as a direct consequence of the frustrated coup d’etat of 23F. This article, based on internal and unpublished documentation, revises this analysis, attributing the position of the Socialist Party, not only to a reaction against the intentional involvement, but as a product of a broader process, initiated after the approval of the Constitution. The socialists, conditioned by their ideological trajectory, were developing a policy on regional matters that was influenced by the situation and that depended on the vicissitudes of the state context and on those that affected the regional processes of each territory. Strategic, electoral, and ideological issues, and an attitude that tried to reconcile positions related to the «State responsibility» with keeping promises on the demands of self-government, interacted delaying a pact on which it was debated since the new legal framework left open the new structure of the State. This research analyzes the coincidence between centrists and socialists about the need to «rationalize» the construction of the future State of the autonomies since 1979. In fact, «harmonizing» the autonomous process was a fundamental objective in the PSOE long before that the 23F offered the Socialists the ideal opportunity to reach a State agreement and design a consistent model with the principles that the party had defended since the beginning of the Transition.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vega Rodríguez-Flores Parra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



