The European Union in the light of History: A stocktaking seventy years later (1950-2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.44.06Abstract
Seventy years after Robert Schuman’s «Declaration» of 9 May 1950, which set the process of European integration in motion in a reliable way, it seems a very appropriate moment to present an assessment of the process in the light of history. At the same time, from certain sectors of academia, politics and the media, the Eurosceptics, not to mention the most clearly anti-European, and in relation to the uncertainty in which the European Union seems to be, have begun to raise doubts about the validity of the integration project itself. Faced with these questions, and depending on the positive balance that, according to the still majority feeling, can be presented seventy years later, it is argued, paraphrasing the enlightened, that if the European Union did not exist, it would have to be invented.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Guillermo A. Pérez Sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
