Historiography and the popular fronts in France and Spain: A comparative survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.41.02Keywords:
Popular fronts, historiography, comparative historiography, France, Spain, anti-fascism.Abstract
This article carries out a historiographical comparison of the academic literature dealing with the Popular Front periods of France and Spain. More specifically, this text aims exploring bibliographic production on the French Popular Front from the eyes of the Spanish case in search of comparative elements in order to contemplate the research generated by the latter with a greater perspective. The important role of the Popular Front in recent contemporary Spanish historiography and the debates and controversies that its study generates justify this research. The objective is not only to pay attention to the similarities and differences in the way in which the two episodes have been historically studied. This article also addresses how the study and historiographical representation of both periods have been conditioned by their different duration and nature, the approaches used while analyzing them, the evolution and rhythms with which French and Spanish societies have approached their two popular fronts, and the role they play in the polemics and “wars of memory” in both countries.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 José Luis Ledesma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
