The Basque Gypsy people in the nineteenth century: Between assimilation and reaffirmation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.40.03Keywords:
Gypsy people, nineteenth century, Basque Country, repression, assimilation.Abstract
Research has tended to treat the Gypsy people’s past as if it were homogenous, in spite of certain factors that characterize their evolutionary dynamics as different. The objective of this article was to analyse the individual evolution of a series of Gypsy families in the cultural and geographical environment of the Basque Country in the nineteenth century. The factors that determined their uneven progress can be summed up as the possibility of double jeopardy due to the imposition of the legislative prerogatives of the Basque provinces at the same time as the law of Spain, and their unique culture. Micro-historical analysis was used in an effort to move beyond the uniform view of the history of the Gypsy people and to find out more about Basque Gypsy families. The conclusions led to the establishing of a previously undefined human group, the Basque Gypsies, born of repression, followed by assimilation. It was contact with other groups of Castilian Gypsies—who paradoxically regarded them as Gazhe [non-Gypsies]—that helped prevent Basque gypsy families in Spain from becoming completely diluted in cultural terms.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 David Martín Sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.