The idea of Spain in Spanish reactionary discourse (1808-1814)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.41.07Keywords:
Counterrevolution, anti-liberalism, Spanish nationalism, National Catholicism, Peninsular War.Abstract
Many recent scholars have assumed that liberal nationalism arose long before reactionary nationalism, and more specifically, that Spanish “national Catholicism” did not emerge until the second half of the 19th century. This assumption has led a number of noted historians to embrace the following ideas concerning the political discourse of the so-called “serviles”: 1) that it opposed the Bonapartes for religious and not patriotic reasons; 2) that it was thoroughly absolutist and did not grant any role to the nation in its political schemes; 3) that it rejected the word patria and even more the word nation; 4) that it deeply feared the people; 5) that it did not invoke the heroes of the fatherland or elaborate a national historical narrative opposed to that of the liberals; 6) that it did not espouse the idea of the “anti-Spain”; and 7) and that it showed signs of xenophobia but did not exalt the Spanish national identity. Without pretending to solve the much debated question of the origins and nature of modern nationalism, this article shows that the reactionary texts published in Spain between 1808 and 1814 do not support any of these historiographical assertions.Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Juan Pablo Domínguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.