Clamour and rebellion. The Gypsy women during the extermination project of 1749
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.40.02Keywords:
General raid, extermination project, gypsy ethnicity, prejudices, marginalization.Abstract
The subject of this article is the gypsy women and their attitude towards the captivity suffered with the general raid of 1749. Few are the studies dedicated to this historic episode, and even more, those which have the gypsy women as the protagonists. A characteristic which contrast with the plenty of primary sources to rebuild one of the darkest episodes of Spanish history: the extermination project of 1749. This article has two parts. The first one describes the origin and development of the raid and later Gypsy people extermination project. The second one focuses on the different destinies reserved for women, immersed in a tragic desolation periplus, misery, hunger, illness and death; but also in hope manifested by their rebellion. The gypsy women from the middle of the XVIII century are shown indomitable and decided in their fight to recover what was taken away: their family and freedom.Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Martínez Martínez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
