“Disciplining the Gypsy” in the XXth century: Laws and para-penal conditions in Spain from a European perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.40.05Keywords:
Gypsy Question, anti-gypsyism, social dangerousness, discriminatory criminal laws, Law against Vagrants and Crooks.Abstract
This work approaches to the “Gypsy Question” in Spain with reference to available studies on coercive measures against this minority group undertaken in Europe throughout the XIXth and XXth centuries. Firstly, it will deal with the current state of the art on other national case studies. This will provide our research proposal on the “presumption of guilt” targeting the Roma due to the introduction of the notion of “social dangerousness” in the Spanish criminal laws with a European context. In particular, starting with specific legislation on the “gypsy” during the Restoration period, this work will pay attention to the inter-wars years with republican population control and re-socialization instruments like the Law against Vagrants and Crooks in 1933, and the first Francoism with the toughening of criminal stigmatization on people whose social conditions made them be labelled as “gypsies”. To this aim, we will analyse legal texts, press news, court records and technical reports generated within the Spanish legal and penitentiary circuit.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Carolina García Sanz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.