The reception of Bergson thoughts in the Spanish reactionary thought. Vitalism and national-Catholicism in José Pemartín y Sanjuán (1888-1954)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.40.09Keywords:
Bergson, José Pemartín, reactionary thought, religious modernism, reactionary nationalism.Abstract
The main topic of this paper is how the Spanish right-wing intellectuals during the interwar years embraced the philosophy of Henri Bergson by means of the previous borrowing made by the national-catholic philosopher José Pemartín y Sanjuán (1888-1854). Considering a conception of the History of Philosophy that also uses the social sciences to gain in reflexivity and analytical skills too, this work will study the main texts in which the author made an use and an explicit defense of Bergson’s work against liberalism and socialism. But also the paper will make visible the anathema that the most intransigent sectors of the Church sentenced against this French philosopher. Thus, it will be shown the connection between Spanish reactionary thought and international networks and debate forums, as well as the use of intellectual goods that were circulating in these debates in order to philosophically legitimate philosophically a discourse bound to fascism during the thirties and which will form a core part of Francoist policy.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 ÁLVARO CASTRO SÁNCHEZ
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.