Reputation and elites: Scandals and symbolic capital in liberal Spain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.39.04Keywords:
Scandals, reputation, symbolic capital, notables.Abstract
This article analyses the importance that prestige and reputation played in the social legitimacy of liberal elites. While the literature has traditionally assumed that the social preeminence of liberal elites relied on their control of the “mechanisms of influence” (e.g. clientelism and patronage), and to their adscription to broader spaces of sociability (e.g. political parties and networks of affinity), our intention is to examine the function that public image played in the survival (and decline) of political elites. By focusing on a scandal that affected one of the great press baron dynasties in Barcelona, the article will uncover the historical transformation of moral values concerning the values of legitimacy and authority, and at the same time examine how the growing importance of public opinion and the press profoundly transformed routine liberal politics. In this way, scandals will be used as an heuristic tool to renew the study of elites based on an interdisciplinary perspective that combines cultural and media history.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Pol Dalmau Palet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.