The art of lasting… On the continuity of local powers in rural Galicia between Francoism and transition to democracy (1973–1979)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.40.12Keywords:
Transition to democracy, local power, patronage networks, political parties, Galicia.Abstract
This article documents, using a biographical methodology, those concrete ways of patrimonial use of political power that allowed an important fraction of francoist socioeconomic and political élites last through the end of the Regime and the Transition to democracy. Our analysis focus on the Galician (North West Spain) southern provinces of Ourense and Pontevedra, where we have found evidences of that kind of practices of patronage in the management of the territory and the community resources, in collusion with Spanish government strategies to ensure a successful institutional spread of the ruling party networks (Unión de Centro Democrático – UCD) across the country.Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Daniel Lanero Táboas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
