Contemporary terrorism in the light of Carl Schmitt’s thought: The metamorphosis of the partisan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.39.12Keywords:
Carl Schmitt, partisans, yihadist terrorism, Ius publicum europaeum.Abstract
The expansion of jihadist terrorism is considered one of the most serious problems of international politics. In order to understand its roots and conceptual origins it is necessary to take a look at the theory of the philosopher and jurist Carl Schmitt. Schmitt devoted part of his work to the study of the partisan or guerrilla phenomenon. As he explains, the partisans emerged in the 19th century and they were categorized by their irregularity, their mobility and their political and telluric nature. With the development of the technique and in the context of the bipolar struggle, the partisans of the 20th century would lose the restraint which characterized them initially. There is a debate about whether the terrorist of the 21st century appears as the evolution of these partisans or if, on the contrary, it constitutes a different figure. To answer this question I compare in this article, from the theoretical perspective of Carl Schmitt, the traits of the jihadist with those of the guerrilla.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Laila Yousef Sandoval
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.