Discussing postwar francoist repression in the Basque Country: Between extermination and oasis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.37.13Keywords:
Francoism, postwar, repression, Basque Country.Abstract
This article aims to analyze the debates generated about postwar Francoist repression in the Basque Country. First, the article notes that the undeniable advance of academic historiography in relation to Spanish civil war and postwar has not prevented a strong social implementation of some kind of thesis, characterized by being divorced from academy, based on clear ideological view and also on easy assimilation clichés, on events that took place during that time. So while from academia is indicated that repression in Basque Country did not reach virulence level deployed in the most of the rest of provinces, militant narratives presents Francoist repression as a secular Spanish genocidal project aimed at annihilating “basque nation”. The last part delves into the matter showing the numbers and factors that conditioned postwar repression in the Basque Country. The article concludes discarding definitely “extermination” theories but also questioning “oasis” thesis advocated by some academic authors.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Erik Zubiaga Arana
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.