Death Penalty in Restoration Spain: A History of Social Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.35.09Keywords:
Death penalty, social change, political power, emotions, social mobilizationAbstract
The death penalty is an expression of power, full of great dramatic force, where different representations and political meanings, cultural values and social attitudes tend to converge. This article analyzes the social function and the political use of the death penalty, its forms, meanings and transformations during Restoration Spain, from public execution to its moderation, privacy and the increase in mercy. The main objective is to clarify the relationship of this complex phenomenon with different construction processes and rationalization of the structures of political power, the emergence of new sensibilities that stress the inhumane and uncivilized character of executions and the development of political actors and forms of social mobilization based on demand for rights. Thus, the changes in the forms of punishment are essential to understand the changes in the society of that time and the returns it was exposed to.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Óscar Bascuñán Añover
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.