Identity in movement: The agency of “catholic women” in the battle against secularization (1856-1913)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.37.02Keywords:
Catholic Women, Modern Spain, identity, agency, secularization.Abstract
This article puts forth an analysis of the particular nature of a catholic women ´s mobilization in the first decade of the twentieth century. Even though “catholic women” had responded previously, the “catholic women” involved in the battle against secularization in the beginning of the last century were different subjects from their “predecessors”. These early twentieth-century “catholic women” can be understood within the parameters of theoretical considerations of the agency of religious subjects as unfixed, discontinuous identities and unrelated to identity categories elaborated by institutions or religious and political leaders. The usual, dichotomous visions of the relation between religion and modernity give way to the conclusion that these identities that made the movement possible were articulated around modern notions of sexual difference and, it could be said, a secularized, auto-reflexive subject.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Angela Cenarro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.