El impacto de los escándalos de corrupción sobre el voto en las elecciones generales de 1996.
Abstract
The paper assesses the impact of corruption scandals on Spaniards' the general election of 1996. After reviewing the literature on this topic and posing the conditions for a scandal to have impact on the vote (sections 1 and 2), our analysis proceeds in three steps (sections 3, 4 and 5). Fors, some survey data on the importance of political corruption vis-a-vis other problems of the Spanish society are presented. Second, we focus on the relationship between the opinions about corruption and the actual voting behavior, taking into account the effects of other factors. Finally, we use our data to test whether it is possible or not to distinguish between different groups of voters in terms of their patterns of reaction to corruption scandals.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
