Las consecuencias electorales de la corrupción.
Abstract
The article analyzes two hypotheses about the effects of corruption on electoral behavior. According to the first hypothesis, citizens react to a greater exent to the government's reaction corruption scandals than to the scandals in themselves. This is consistent with the fact that the emergence of scandals escapes the government's control, whereas the reactions to the scandals are its own responsability. According the second hypothesis, corruption scandals cannot be reduced to an issue that could be located in the left-right axis of political competition, and henee these scandals tend to weaken ideological voting to the incumbent party affected by the scandals. The two hypotheses are tested with data comingfrom several surveys corresponding to the period of socialdemocratic government in Spain.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
