El Gremialismo de Antonio de Capmany (1742-1813). La idea del trabajo de un conservador ingenuo.
Abstract
Antonio de Capmany's presence in the Spanish debate about craft guild's control of labour and production in the 18th century, meant a significant contribution. His discourse on the need of graft guilds cleverly embraces both new and traditional approaches. He manages to combine successfully relevant issues of the political economy and philosophical anthropology existing at the time, with an advanced conception of history and a great concern with the social and political visibility of skilled workers. Regarding Spanish and European controversy over labour organisation in that period, this author represents a conservative option tinged with a certain amount of attractive ingenousness, that is, with a certain lack of prejudice which allows him to incorpórate arguments and proposi-tions of various origins.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
