De la revolución hacia la democracia representativa. El 2.Q Pacto MFA-Partidos Políticos.
Abstract
Este estudio analiza el pacto suscrito entre el poder revolucionario militar que derribó al Estado Novo y los partidos políticos con representación en la Asamblea Constituyente para construir en Portugal una democracia representativa. Conocido como 2.-Plataforma de acuerdo constitucional, este compromiso condicionó decisivamente la elaboración de la Constitución de 1976. La ruptura que representó la revolución de abril de 1974 con el régimen anterior, no fue imitada por la Asamblea Constituyente en relación con el poder militar constituido que la había convocado. La transición de Portugal hacia una democracia de corte occidental, se concretó en este pacto, donde el poder militar reconocía la tran-sitoriedad de su institucionalización como órgano de soberanía y los principales partidos políticos aceptaban, temporalmente, la tutela militar.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.