Intelectuales, universidad y opinión pública. El grupo de Oviedo.
Abstract
This article is an attempt to analyse the role played by the pro-fessors at universidad de Oviedo within the intellectuals at the be-ginning of the twentieth century. It deals with their philosophical background (krausism), with the University as an institution with a significant role, one that goes further than science and reaches the whole society, and with the special concern about public opinión and the need for culture, for education, deeply rooted in Spanish society at that time. This group of intellectuals tried to have an influence on those who, at the same time, were forming public opinión. It also deals with the extent to which these intellectuals considered politi-cal action as the only way (as a must, in fact) to achieve their ideáis. A policy that should be, above all, social policy. In doing so, the Oviedo group gained for University professors a prestigious place not only in society but also amongst the intellectuals.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
