La distribución de divisas en el sector industrial: poder público y poder privado en lucha por las divisas.
Abstract
The article examines the behaviour of the francoist administration in commercial and monetary policy with the aim of addressing the different position of public and prívate firms when confronting the economic authorities. The data provided allow us to reject that public firms enjoyed direct access to import licence and show that the capacity of the Ministry of Industry and Trade to decide over the allocation of foreign currency was partially restricted. Moreover the difference in the treatment given to public firms suggests the necessity of qualifying the statements about general preference for public firms versus prívate agents. The proposed alternative interpretation claims that the capacity to access to import licence was more dependent on the firm management's proximity to the governmental decisión circles than on the public or prívate nature of the firm.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
