El Marx teológico de Enrique Dussel

Authors

  • GABRIEL LIVOV

Abstract

This essay claims to analyse the reading that the argentine philosopher Enrique Dussel made of the famous thinker from Tréveris, framing him in-side the ideological scene of liberation theology. We are interested in thin-king the ways in which Dussel put to use the theological discourse of liberation in order to politicize the categories of Marx's political economy and, in so doing, to criticize the economicist/cientificist approach to Marx's works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-04-25

Issue

No. 13 (2005): enero-junio

Section

MISCELLANY

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.

PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD

The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.

Metrics