Raiders of the Lost Precedent Three notes on the complex re-lations between
Abstract
Carlism and Catalanism in the late I9h Century Catalán Nationalist circles have formulated and Consolidated some the-ses which are, to say the least, very debatable from a historical point of view. The most significant of these is the idea that Carlism was a sort of precedent of Catalán Nationalism and that, consequently, Catalán Carlists evolved towards Catalanism in a natural, logical and necessary way since the last fourth of the 19th Century. Nevertheless, as is usually the case with historical processes, reality was much less simple and more nuanced. Jordi Canal's article studies three particular cases —those of Luis M. de Llauder, Marian Vayreda, and Joan Bardina— in order to show the tense and complex relations between Carlism and Catalanism in the late 19th Century.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
