To be or not to be. The visión of Spanish nationa-lism from the Catalanist perspective
Abstract
Generally speaking, Spanish historians (and, of course, the foreign his-panists who, in such matters, trail after them) have not found it useful to read and profit from historians who are defined as «nationalist» (Le., who question the existence of a single and/or simple «Spanish nation» from the narrative perspective of other alleged «national entities» historically within «Spain». The response of Spanish historians to such a challenge has tended to be defensive, even aggressive, in the face of what is perceived to be an attack on the coherence of their field of study. The author of this essay, a Barcelona-based historian generally disliked by Catalán nationalist historians for his critical tone towards their historiographic production, sug-gests that such a closed and defensive posture by Spanish historians is a serious scientific or analytical mistake, as the criticism offered from the different perspective of «Hispanic» but «non-Spanish» (or even «anti-Spa-nish») historiographies is rich in insights, most precisely for practioners of «Spanish historiography», given their vested interest in understanding «Spain» and «Spanishness» as a field of study. The author offers some ba-sic examples of useful «lessons» to be gleaned from the perspective of Catalán nationalist historiography.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.