Peasant association and basque nationalism (1933-1936)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.38.09Keywords:
Peasant association, Basque nationalism, Republica, Solidaridad de Trabajadores Vascos.Abstract
The general elections of Spanish republican period confirm a novelty, the consolidation of Basque nationalism in rural areas. Among the reasons for this success is the appearance of the peasant association called Euzko Nekazari Bazkuna (ENB, Basque Peasants Federation) in 1933 in Guipuzcoa. This article’s aim is to analyze the relationship between ENB, the PNV and Solidaridad de Trabajadores Vascos, also extending the field of study to the province of Vizcaya, where in 1935 Euzko Nekazari Alkartasuna (Solidarity of Basque Peasants) was formed. It also seeks to emphasize the fact that this associative proposal only succeed when peasants decided to group by themselves.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Mikel Aizpuru Murua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
