Mobilization models and sites of memory in Basque nationalism. The limits of a political culture.
Keywords:
Political culture, Basque nationalism, Restoration, mobilization.Abstract
The article analyzes the rise and expansion of nationalist political identity as a factor of cohesion, both in the socio-political and in the symbolic realms, and its transformation into a genuine «political culture». This leads us to question the concept of community which some authors employ to characterize the PNV of the republican period, to the nationalism of the Restoration. As well as the idea that the generation of Lizardi, born at the beginning of the 20th Century, carried out the work of primitive accumulation of modern and traditional elements that would eventually be configured as such in the Republican years. I argue, instead, that there was a cultural and political universe which may be deemed nationalist, but that these shared their symbolic world and identity with other people and groups that, like themselves, affirmed the existence of a differentiated Basque reality, although they did not share the political formulations of the followers of Sabino Arana. Otherwise, nationalist sites of memory, especially shrines and hermitages, were frequently shared by that more extensive collective of diffuse basquisme.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.