The crisis and recomposition of the State in Republican Spain, seen through the Catalan example.
Keywords:
Spanish Civil War, social revolution, antifascism, committees.Abstract
In the zone that was under theoretical control of the Government of the Republic, the process of resetting of the State —whose structure had been largely sunk and dismasted after the events of July 1936— required the collaboration of all the workers’ organizations, and the use of the discourse of «antifascism» as main axis of recovery of the republican legality. The process counted paradoxically on the decisive collaboration of two sectors that only months before had advocated, one way or another, the rupture of the republican legality: the leaders of the CNT-FAI in Catalonia, and the largocaballerismo in the rest of Republican Spain.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
