Liberalism, politics, and constitution in moderm Spain (an overview from the constitutional history).
Keywords:
Liberalsim, doceañismo, postrevolutionary liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Political Culture, Constitutional History.Abstract
This article is an essay review on two recent books about Spanish Constitutional History. At his work Joaquín Varela analyses the relationship between constitutional ideas and the liberal political culture in the Modern Spanish From the scholastic iusnaturalism —Martínez Marina— to the revolucionary liberalism —Argüelles, Florez Estrada—, postrevolucionary liberalism —Balmes, Pacheco, Donoso— or later in liberal democracy, the development of the Constitutional History was extremely complex. Under the influence of the scholastic iusnaturalism, nationalist historicism and the krausistic ideas, the arrival of juridical positivism in the Spanish political culture was weak, as the juridical ideas of Adolfo Posada have shown. This essay let him to check hard lines which ruled recent historiography about Spanish liberalism. At the same time Varela tries to set up Constitutional as academic discipline in Spain.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.