C onflict in the squares. Strategies, symbols and rituals of the nationalist first of May (Buenos Aires, 1930-1943).
Keywords:
Argentina, 20th century, Nationalism, Mobilisation.Abstract
Right-wing and far right-wing groups in Argentina have developed a range of forms of political intervention that cannot be dismissed as out-and-out rejection of the presence of large sections of the population in public life. Rather, they reveal different attempts to control and channel this participation. In the thirties, a decade during which nationalist organisations sprung up in profusion, the Argentine right-wing changed from being an arrangement of small groups of conspiring intellectuals to become a militant movement, with stable organisations and clear-cut intentions to mobilise the masses. The 1st of May was a key component of the nationalist strategy to bring the these sections of the general public on board, as their intention was to use the celebrations to forge a new working class identity. These were mobilisations that had an impact on the inhabitants of the city that took part in the protests to differing degrees, as well as on the workers — who joined this idelogical current or rejected it.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.