The republicanising drive in the Navarre government in the early nineteen thirties.
Keywords:
Spain, Navarre, 2nd Republic, regional policy.Abstract
This article delves into the reasons underlying the republicanising strategies of the first Comisión Gestora of the Navarre Government between 1931 and 1933. Navarra was the epicentre of counter-revolutionary forces throughout the Second Republic. For the first two years (1931-32) it was governed by a management committee known as the Comisión Gestora, designated by the central government. It comprised seven members, with a core of three people (the socialist, Constantino Salinas and the Republicans, Rugino García Larrache and David Jaime Deán) that worked together for the republican cause in the province, which had unique administrative and fiscal autonomy. Encouraged by the 36% of the votes that the Socialists and Republicans together had amassed, they thought that the republic could be established in Navarre by applying initiatives regarding the communal distribution that would benefit the poorest peasants, whilst the provincial government administration could back this up with agrarian reforms driven through from Madrid. They thought that a single institutional and political system joining Navarre with the Basque provinces would be politically profitable, foreseeing a statute for this in keeping with the republican constitution.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.