The debate about the model for constructing Europe in France, Italy, Germany and Spain (1930-1950)
Keywords:
Pro-european movement, Spain, Europe, political ideas.Abstract
The article analyses the debate around the model for European construction arising in France, Italy, Germany and Spain from 1930-1950. It examines the historic background to the idea of European construction during the interwar period, such as the first collective movements, which were then articulated after the Second World War around the European Movement. In the case of Spain, the first pro-European proposals, with roots in the ideas of Joaquín Costa, developed around figures such as José Ortega y Gasset, Salvador de Madariaga and Juan Marichal. After the Spanish Civil War, coinciding with the post-war years elsewhere in Europe, various pro-European groups in exile and in Spain, some of them expressing a moderate opposition to Franco’s regime, took steps to join international pro-European movements. The article highlights the fact that, while starting from different political, historical and cultural environments, especially in the case of Spain at that time, common features can be identified in the genesis and evolution of the pro-European ideas in the different countries analysed.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.