The rise and fall of an ‘uncontrollable’ in republican Spain: Luis Bonilla Echevarría 1936-1938
Keywords:
Spain, political violence, 1936 Civil War, terror.Abstract
This article analyzes the career of a militia captain executed as an ‘uncontrollable’ by the Republic in 1938 to re-examine critically the utility of employing the concept of ‘uncontrollables’ to explain the terror in the Republican zone in 1936. The article suggests that the example of Bonilla illustrates the ambiguous reaction towards the terror shown by Republican military and police commanders as well as by Popular Front organizations during the civil war. While Bonilla was seen in the summer of 1936 as part of the necessary struggle against active but clandestine internal enemies, he was executed in 1938 for the brutal killing of ten suspected ‘fascists’ in the village of Los Navalucillos (Toledo) in September 1936 because his failure to join a Popular Front organisation left him vulnerable to charges that he was motivated by greed rather than the desire to defend the Republic.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.