Public reason and respect: on the limits of tolerance
Keywords:
Political thought, public reason, respect, public and private.Abstract
The starting point in this article is tolerance. This fundamental idea of modern thought is at the foundations of liberalism and its theoretical constructs and institutional reflections, articulating how people live together within constitutional systems. The contemporary understanding of tolerance links into the Rawlsian idea of public reason and similar ideas, and it is at the heart of the debate about the requirements and restrictions that institutions may permissibly impose upon argument. formulations of these restrictions is driven by an idea of respect, sometimes more explicitly than others. This is present in arguments denying the need for any kind of restriction. links that the different parties to the debate have established between the idea of respect and other values define divergent ideas of society and personal rights. At the same time, they configure different ideas of tolerance.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
