Divergent paths of liberal reconciliation: the Portugal of la Regeneraçao and the Spain of the Liberal Union (1856-1861)
Keywords:
Portugal, Spain, politics, 19th century, liberalism, comparative history.Abstract
The political stability achieved by the Regeneration system in Portugal makes it possible to consider the process initiated in 1851 as a model of liberal reconciliation. The new rules it laid down obliged the political forces to re-group (the Regenerators and the Historicals) in order to adapt to the new space in which the political battle would be played out and reformulate their respective political identities. initiatives for reconciliation taken by the Unión Liberal in Spain during O’Donnell’s long government, following the experience of the two years of progressive governments (el Bienio), tried to adopt a strategy of constituting a third party at the cost of the traditional parties, both of which were bogged down in their own internal crises. However, it did not reach its goals, as the Moderates and Progressives undermined the calls to reconciliation made by the Unionists and put themselves forward as the alternative power.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
