Spain 1977. Political agreements dealing with the crisis
Keywords:
Spain, 20th century, politics, economy, transition to democracyAbstract
The article analyses the political process (between July and October 1977) which led up to all the political parties signing, and Parliament ultimately passing the Pactos de la Moncloa (Moncloa pacts). The general election gave Adolfo Suarez’s Government the legitimacy it needed to deal with the economic crisis that had already dragged on for four years. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the crisis as well as the results of that election obliged the Government to implement a policy of agreement and consensus. The article pays particular attention to the parliamentary debates on the floor and in the economic parliamentary committee. The aim is to measure the scope and the limitations of said policy of consensus among the different political parties, even the party in power, as well as among the unions and the business organisations.
Downloads
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Mercedes Cabrera
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.