The look at Madrid: anticasticismo and castellanismo in the radical falangist discourse of the immediate postwar
Keywords:
Casticismo, anticasticismo, radical falangism, falangist nationalismAbstract
This article explores the radical falangist discourse about the anticasticista criticism launched on the city of Madrid. The aim is to work out what was the meaning of this polysemous concept —casticismo/anticasticismo— highlighting the different connotation given to it. Next, what is settled down is where the antidote for the casticista deviation according to this discourse was. The thesis which articulates this paper is that beyond the criticism on Madrid lied down a wider one about the wrong that ravaged Spain. In the same sense, the idea is that under the claim of Madrid reflecting the ideal castellanista, is possible to find the falangist discourse about the nation.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Zira Box
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
