Franco, ¿fascist caudillo? Consecutive and contradictory falangist conceptions about francoist caudillaje
Keywords:
Falange, Fascism, Francoism, CaudillajeAbstract
Following an initial approach to the multiple meanings of the term «caudillo» before the Spanish Civil War, the text is a quick review of the subsequent change from the plurality — of «caudillos», with miniscule — to the singularity, «The caudillo», and how, thereafter, the various Falangists conceptualizations were developed as essential manifestations of a political project confronted with other alternative ones. Above all, it is stressed that there wasn’t a single Francoist conception of Franco’s caudillaje, nor a Falangist one, but many, changing and contradictory conceptions. In this regard, the text places considerable emphasis on the figure of Francisco Javier Conde, generally considered the theorist par excellence of Franco’s caudillaje, who neither was the sole Falangist in doing it, nor even he did it always the same way.Downloads
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Ismael Saz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.