The State According to the High Civil Servants of the Spanish Ministry of Finances, 1881-1936
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.36.04Keywords:
Treasury, civil servants, State attorneys, State-building, State imaginariesAbstract
This article presents the common elements of the visions of the State among the special corps and superior classes of the general corps of the Ministry of Finance between the final decades of the 19th century and the Civil War. It is organised in three parts. The two first parts describe the general traits of the administrative model that became hegemonic in the Ministry after the reforms of Bravo Murillo and the evolution of this model after 1881, thanks to the multiplication of special corps, which were to become the reference of the evolution of the Ministry. The third part sums up the central elements in the comprehension of the State, which can be derived from the different public discourses of the civil servants who worked for the Ministry of Finance. Three features, which were linked to the previous evolution of the tax administration, are underlined in the third section. Firstly, the understanding of the State as Administration. In the second place, the generalised assumption of technical and specialised knowledge as the very foundation of the bureaucratic career. And, finally, an organicist vision of the Administration (understood as the essence of the State) which referred its good working to the good working of its component parts.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Juan Pan-Montojo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.