The “Negrinismo” Evolution in the Republican Exile in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.36.13Keywords:
Exile, republican, Negrín, negrinismo, MexicoAbstract
This paper analyses the organization and the evolution of the so called “negrinismo” in the Spanish Republican exile in Mexico. After the 1939 Republican defeat, the leading figure of Juan Negrin was seen as an example and a hope by a quiet an important sector of the defeated ones coming from all the political spectrum. Juan Negrin supporters assembled a cross-wise political network related to his leading figure and to the Republican legality defence. Exiled from the Socialist and other political parties took part in this network. This paper focus on this group main contributions in the Mexican exile and it also analyses the group composition, as well as the controversy created between the group and its leader, Juan Negrin, regarding the political strategy and the relationship with other exiled groups.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Jorge de Hoyos Puente
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.