The Historiographical Origins of the Concept of ‘Pactism’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.34.10Keywords:
Pactism’, historiography, Jaume Vicens Vives, catalanism, constitutionalismAbstract
Both Catalan historiography and nationalism have fully assumed a ‘pactist’ view of medieval and modern Catalan society, before the War of the Spanish Succession, as an opposed model to Castilian authoritarianism. The article seeks the origins of this conceptualization, founding them in the historian Jaume Vicens Vives, who created the term ‘pactism’ around 1950. He did it being influenced by the former Catalan intellectual tradition, which provided a full range of elements that would remain associated with the concept of ‘pactism’, as its so-called particularity within the European context, comparable only to the English case, and its link to a moral character of the Catalan people, based on an alleged respect for pacts.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Vicent Baydal Sala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
